"Proposing amendments to the Constitution of the State of Alaska relating to and limiting appropriations from and inflation-proofing the Alaska permanent fund by establishing a percent of market value spending limit."
"Making these changes in the Constitution, rather than in Alaska Statutes adds an additional layer of protection to the fund because the Constitution can only be changed with a vote of the people."
- Rep. Samuels
House Joint Resolution 26 proposes changing Alaska's Constitution to require inflation proofing of the entire Permanent Fund and to limit the payouts from the fund. This resolution was introduced at the request of the Permanent Fund Corporation's Board of Trustees.
Many large endowments and public funds use a system known as "percent of market value" payouts, or POMV, to provide payouts while still protecting both the principal and earnings of a fund. POMV limits payouts to a set percentage of the fund's market value, often 5 percent. This has shown to be the maximum sustainable payout rate that will still maintain a fund's real value over time.
However, under current law only the principal of the Permanent Fund is protected and inflation-proofed. The earnings reserve account is not considered part of the principal, is not inflation-proofed and is open to appropriation. In addition, payouts are computed as a portion of the Fund's earnings. This means that if the Fund were to have little or no earnings in a single year, a payout for dividends or other State spending would not be allowed.
Moving to a POMV system and adding the earnings reserve to the Fund would not only provide inflation proofing of the entire fund, but would provide a more reliable and predictable payout each year, regardless of the Fund's performance in an individual year. This would make it more likely that the State could continue the Permanent Fund Dividend program in the future, an outcome that is heartily supported by many Alaskans.
Making these changes in the Constitution, rather than in Alaska Statutes adds an additional layer of protection to the fund because the Constitution can only be changed with a vote of the people.
If passed, HJR 26 would place an initiative on the next statewide election ballot that would propose the following three changes to Alaska's Constitution:
Remove the provision that "all income be deposited in the general fund unless otherwise provided by law"
Add a provision that would not allow appropriations from the Fund to exceed 5 percent of the average market value of the Fund over five years
Add a provision that would consider the money in the earnings reserve account to be part of the Permanent Fund
The Official Web Site of the House and Senate Legislative Majorities for the Alaska State Legislature
To Report Technical Problems or Contact Webmasters